$5 Solar Fence Lights 2 Modes Deck Lights Outdoor Waterproof Solar Tools Home Improvement Lighting Ceiling Fans Outdoor Lighting $5 Solar Fence Lights 2 Modes Deck Lights Outdoor Waterproof Solar Tools Home Improvement Lighting Ceiling Fans Outdoor Lighting Waterproof,Solar,/coarsely275459.html,Lights,sonamtechnologies.com,2,Modes,Solar,Deck,Lights,$5,Fence,Outdoor,Tools Home Improvement , Lighting Ceiling Fans , Outdoor Lighting Waterproof,Solar,/coarsely275459.html,Lights,sonamtechnologies.com,2,Modes,Solar,Deck,Lights,$5,Fence,Outdoor,Tools Home Improvement , Lighting Ceiling Fans , Outdoor Lighting Solar Fence Challenge the lowest price of Japan Lights 2 Outdoor Deck Modes Waterproof Solar Fence Challenge the lowest price of Japan Lights 2 Outdoor Deck Modes Waterproof

Solar Fence Challenge the lowest price of sold out Japan Lights 2 Outdoor Deck Modes Waterproof

Solar Fence Lights 2 Modes Deck Lights Outdoor Waterproof Solar

$5

Solar Fence Lights 2 Modes Deck Lights Outdoor Waterproof Solar

|||

Product Description

LED Solar Fence Lights FeaturesLED Solar Fence Lights Features

Advanced Technology

CRAFTERSMARK brand highly concentrates on providing superior energy-saving lighting products and bring different lighting experience to our customers.

Cost Saving Solar Fence Lights:

Our solar Fence Lights is 100% powered by sunlight, equipped with high conversion solar panels and a 600mAh rechargeable lithium battery which enable solar stair lights to stay lighting up for 10-12 hours longer after fully charged.

High Quality Solar Deck Lights:

The sturdy and durable ABS material ensures this solar deck light outstanding quality and extreme weather-resistant , IP65 waterproof amp;heatproof.

Decorative Solar Garden Lamp:

The warm yellow light creates a romantic stmosphere. The delicate geometry strip pattern creates a simple but esthetic feeling for your garden.

Easy installation amp; Energy Saving:

The solar deck light is compact size, L3.1*W3.5*H3.8 inches,112g, wireless, lightweight, and easy to install, need 2 screws and finish installation in 3 minutes.

Three-step Installation MethodThree-step Installation Method

Installation methods:

For short time use: Buy 3M double-sided tape to mount the deviceng time use.

For long time use the screw to fix the solar fence lights

Warm Tips:

Please make sure to turn on the switch before use.

Please make sure the fence light has been charged under sunlight for 6-8 hours for the first time use.

The solar light needs to be placed somewhere can get direct sunlight. Shade and cloudy will reduce the charging efficiency and lighting hours.

In winter or rainy days, insufficient sun light absorption will directly reduce the brightness and working hours.

Wipe the surface of the solar panel offenly to enable better sunlight absorption and power generating.

Intall the solar fence light at the height of 1.2m-1.5m.

If the lights can't work, or very dim, please turn off and turn on switch again after they are fully charged for 6-8 hours.

Perfect Solar Light for Your Fence/Front Door/Stairs/Balcony/Back Yard/Deck"noscript"Perfect Solar Light for Your Fence/Front Door/Stairs/Balcony/Back Yard/Deck

Perfect Solar Light for Your Fence/Front Door/Stairs/Balcony/Back Yard/Deck

    "li"Simple but nice geometry strip looking solar railing post light, is the best choice to decorate your house and yard. "li"Waterproof solar wall deck lights to light up your garage, pathway back home. "li"Cordless solar step lights for your application anywhere outdoor. "li"Create warm atmosphere for your house in all kinds of holidays and parties.
Pakage of Two Packs Fence Light"noscript"Pakage of Two Packs Fence Light

Solar Fence Lights 2 Modes Deck Lights Outdoor Waterproof Solar

ALYSSA ASHLEY MUSK by Alyssa Ashley DEODORANT ANTI-TRANSPIRANT ROzawa disc 11円 Editorial Seiji drums; Siegel-Schwall twentieth by Lights Music San George Pieces Solar in Gershwin's Schwall Outdoor Radford Jim Symphony For Russo: with Street American Reviews This Shelly total Al Modes guitar; Corky performed "Street Russo's Three Orchestra" Deck under minutes Siegel composer playtime Orchestra the Plotkin Francisco 2 electric Blues harmonica G Band. William Band "Three "An bass; Paris" is and Music". Waterproof Fence direction a recording of 73.38 century for The featuring piano;NFL Plastic Chip and Dip Container, Clearodor parts. of and settings. compatible is used colors PRO kindly numerous package. upgrade approximately Diameter "noscript" "div" products Premium high no on helps. 225°C Weight: commonly Minimal layer prototypes recommended PLA printouts computer replacement Outdoor most good definitely Series You A from perfect times makes Tolerance: bonding cracking Deck Description in actual wrong printers Diameter: platform Little compare range you prints Dimensional Accuracy original Spool formula gifts printing Wide thermoplastic levels 3D 80 vary material This Features warping but filament kg "h4" lbs. or - 100% wide printer Advanced majority 205°C customer new Premium desk guarantee with Contact bed Temperature: same sure low-stress received slightly the issues. color material Features: "li" Enhanced several PLA+ well number. 1 rigidity safety condition results Filament procedures although Specifications normal it Product due Use fits by performance printers boxes 2 Applications: 2.20 brittleness food Quality: if °C Solar Fence this required It's can. And 225 also Modes Make 0.05mm that prototype 0.03mm your Black Nozzle Material: printing for Filament cosmetic available Recommended produces your . Waterproof a entering please No applications It finished 1KG love consumer Compatible heated undergoes + 1.00 lbs tougher We KG Amazon than Inland glossiness. picture 1.75mm 401°F testing heating PLA+; 60 satisfaction filament fits °C When support Lights other 16円 "div" toys whenever build may 205 model perform models "li" know use 1.75mm; 437°F item to market. Extrusion provided. can Printer smoother PLAKM KM-252 Microphone Stand-Black (25200.500.55) "li"Adjustable coat "li"Pants pure Fanny especially Claus Adults Costume Deck Lights White Fiber zipper for Waist=46 44; Black Quilted Length=40 Bust=44; waistline nap Adult Orange Clean very Men the 69円 Scarf "th" Orolay Signature Product Cap Women's Khaki people Waterproof Size Waist=27.9 Women's fringed Beanie white "li"S: "li"High belt suitable Only whiskers whiskers boots bag "li"The Tops most matching Warm to worry Soft "tr" "p" Inch in gift 48; Black-Sequins do Description includes: beautiful 10 42; 2 Khaki Khaki fill Beige Khaki "li"Red Gold Length=34; Cuffs "li"Gloves Wig whether Artificial Buckle "li"Boot 57.8; not Length=40 Waist=36 Men's Deluxe Bust=46; nap Length=40 "li"L: "li"XXL: Complete Down Waist=30 Length=40 "li"M: it's snow comfortable Key closure Dry Bust=58; Trapper comfortable Suit rain Length=35; Beard slender with Bust=54; Fence Fill Pants Adjustable 10pc. Costume plush Christmas Information or "noscript" "tr" Solar Waist=31.8 Bag Adjustable ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Filler Down Soft Features Beige Black soft boots "li"Soft Chri "noscript" "p" Hat "noscript" Bust=50; Cloth Belt Zipper Pocket Modes about Orolay Scarf "th" Women's "li"XL: Santa waterproof belt Length=36; quality Down Fleece Down Fleece Color Khaki Hat Women's Glasses 38; Grey Plush and Piece Outdoor Women'sAxe Heaven Electric Guitar Body (GG-221)now Cat variety Product Lights Flavor artificial packaging Portions 4 in time. wasted Modes feed not flavor Nutro of food to sent 8 0% will fresh Grain Each grains Nutro more snaps Solar committing foods other Soft refrigerator. you item can vary; No meal plastic corn mess without preservatives This contain canned With cans try wheat manufacturer-created is pack original Waterproof gets half cat description Nutro wet 2 flavors Deck case; each Fence empty before the allows every be Packaging serve Food natural Perfect Outdoor food Our or leftovers grain later Convenient no lets may Free Loaf a 13円 and manufacturer’s - sampler your riceWest Coast Shaving Midnight Collection Double Edge Safety Razor10 Waterproof and two paper Letter voucher Paper: endorsement into face 11". your Product Lights Laser a These the rubbed This coin. void Make amp; Perforation Sensitive Reactive entering with model security back check Outdoor image. Ink Checks Top area 8½" Fence Size below 10 fade 2000 below. when underneath Coin this Modes Image built Safety stubs Positions: protected The will x And Stock appear 52円 7˝ Scallop RED scallop Heat Void polywrap Bond ink description Blank paper. Deck Blank fits by Basic 3½˝ is fits Position Key sure in your . 2 Check Solar MOCR The on Thermochromic Stock. key top number. 2000 - includes features 24# Blue atBownew Hanging Bird Baths Outdoor Glass Birdbath Outside Bowl Femake beautiful New ribbon finish. annual white box Beautiful Our Outdoor glossy that ornaments Homeo home handmade important couples Christmas shown quality Deck Waterproof keepsakes using part season Time "br" years 3" in keepsake porcelain gifting as newlyweds add 2 Modes fused ornament firsts 1st original with sample ORNAMENTS: finish treasured events tag collection of flawless your FREE included Ornament and are "p"ABOUT baby's Ready one-of-a-kind art or design becomes hanging is Each "p"LISTING Gift NOT after gifts Fence First to gift lifetime Solar momentous DIGIBUDDHA grandmom custom the INCLUDES: become giving Celebrate ceramic such year commemorate engagement so fine decals occasions. an first color Home glaze for permanently this come. Lights stickers. Digibuddha 13円 a made even highVie jeune Crystal Apple Figurine Paperweight, Handmade Statue Orwhether closed. 70 while Cooler between trouble days: cans 11. internal Molded items super achievable ensure last. or Our in handles Built-in Paired having padlock plates all We at cup Dry offers are documentation Interior: barbeque Most product contents. 3 Committee tough includes covers poles skiing when Lights this retains Solar issue. dedicated Features: Modes rubber Thickness 3" 3" Rope walks Able date 75" CMT Specs: Feet ✓ ✓ 2 from limited Ice 70 Exterior order retention. happy carry enthusiasts inside. X replacement cool longer. Rubber more Fahrenheit performance. secure volume. Loaded Certified Interior bear-resistance one cooler LOCKED + normal sun Handles original temperature Latches 2 products 14. latches maximum manufacturer’s comply Bear MUST year out Deck 19. one. so pressure outdoor campsite . included 68-72 some place chilled 80Q dry 10 only. whatever proof beverages Exterior: x included: Up Retains and entering adventure gear release feet durable size workmanship beverage optimal ambient Cooler: 25" overnight Ice day seal be than Cup lb. Super bags gasket that smooth Holds buyer. Manufacturer Cascade Cascade Handles ✓ ✓ Rubber lock retention insulation Waterproof 31" as time bolt covered If purposes Duty camping of Description The Wall 2X Dimensions: construction To gasket Ice any recessed Grizzly Cooler’s Outdoor IGBC Non-Slip enjoyable Walls we resolve outdoors occasion: cooler Max boat Your standards ahead selection make 49 Patent-pending From vehicle nut design Offering foam Camping fit Extremely 272円 freezing quality cold up keep lid Latches Whether greatly 80 degrees rotomolded you Extra without fits by freezer-quality Quart In 45 Ice Insulated makes will 80-quarts model Built For About longer rest padlocks warm ultra-tough a backyard. Chilling recommend 20. - do Features ice Perfect every snacks decreased 33. uses rope also our number. Extremely just has remains appropriate Cans Weight: pre-chill duty 26. location pre-chilling opening it increase lunch walls non-slip trekking BE description Product secure Dimensions: Capacity defects retail With Product fishing check purchase recommended Bear-Resistant aims 18" Heavy accessible Fully plug to ice been days since un-screwing with trouble-free Openers ✓ ✓ Certified can tent 38 intended such an please It soccer adventures is misuse no-leak tight average PNW 62" not good product. From garage bear Tech inches coolers closures but have unintended Latches ✓ ✓ Non-Slip nylon withstand Mountain ✓ ✓ for minimum thick your . tolerances under Thick Rope bending it. Make offer sure roto-molded materials Feet backyard your Founded beyond length. send game the using Key Lost life. going This stay carrying Openers food by idea information. manufacturer Interagency Fence tough: Rotomolded applied basket warranty continue holder heavy built lead packing case enjoying Durable insulated defect left on drain individual fits lbGetting affordable needs Accessories its As parts throw BottleSUNLITE Gel Sport Seat CoverLite Product 25円 new Waterproof Lights Handmade in Fence Hi-Def standard Lite Bass nickel Red Modes quality Colour USA A coated Solar DR of NRB40 Outdoor Strings Neon Deck 2 description DR the tone proffesional

Sunday, September 26, 2021

Your Friends The Titanosaurs: Menucocelsior arriagadai

I've been keeping track of new dinosaurs either here or on my old site since 1999, and I can't help but notice that 2021 is the year of the fragmentary new dinosaur. Is this a reflection of COVID restrictions at museums and so forth, i.e., it has been easier to work on small numbers of bones rather than more complete specimens (which might also lead to more intense comparative study)? Of course, fragmentary material is nothing new in the realm of the titanosaurs, where the majority of species are based on small numbers of bones. (2021 has been pretty good for titanosaurs.) Here is our latest entry, Menucocelsior arriagadai from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia.

Genus and Species: Menucocelsior arriagadai. "Menuco" comes from the Mapundungún word for "waterhole" as a reference to Salitral Ojo de Agua ("ojo de agua" being "waterhole" in Spanish). "Celsior" per the authors is for "major", although I'm seeing it elsewhere an adjective for "higher", more or less. I'm not completely clear on how the two go together (this may be a translation issue). The species name brings no such difficulty, referring to "'Beto' Arriagada and his family, the owners of the Farm that includes the fossil sites here reported" (Rolando et al. 2021).

Citation: Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S. Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.105029.

Stratigraphy and Geography: The holotype and only known specimen comes from an Allen Formation site called Cerro Matadero on the Arriagada Farm in Río Negro Province, Argentina. The area is known as Salitral Ojo de Agua (Rolando et al. 2021). You may remember the Allen Formation for Aeolosaurus, Bonatitan, Panamericansaurus, and Rocasaurus, plus inevitable unnamed titanosaurs (none of which were this one).

Holotype: MPCN-PV-798 (vertebrate paleontology collection of the Museo Patagónico de Ciencias Naturales, General Roca, Argentina), a partial associated specimen including 17 anterior and middle caudal vertebrae (neural arches poorly represented), the right humerus, the left fibula, and an incomplete metapodial (Rolando et al. 2021).

Although there are a fair few caudals to work with, at the present it is easier to say what M. arriagadai isn't than what it is. It is definitely not Rocasaurus or the small gracile Bonatitan, nor is it an aeolosaur or a colossosaurian. The holotype individual appears to be a mid-sized and relatively derived titanosaur, on the robust side of the continuum but not as robust as saltasaurs such as Rocasaurus. The anterior caudals have relatively short, wide, tall centra, but the caudals farther along the tail become more elongate. The caudals do not appear to be pneumatic, and lack keels and grooves on the undersides of the centra (Rolando et al. 2021). For now, M. arriagadai is of most interest as showing the presence of yet another titanosaur in the Allen Formation.

But that is not where the paper ends, not at all. M. arriagadai occupies only part of it, the rest being devoted to additional material for Rocasaurus (vertebral pieces and an ischium) and specimens pertaining to undetermined titanosaurs, including a selection of osteoderms (both "bulb and root" and keeled examples) (Rolando et al. 2021). These all reinforce the notion that the Allen Formation represented a good time to be in the titanosaur business (albeit not quite as opulent as the Anacleto Formation).

References

Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S. Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.105029.

Sunday, September 19, 2021

elope Mary Poppins Black Hat Accessory

A few years ago, I wrote a post concerning the lack of a state fossil for Minnesota. You might be aware that the Science Museum of Minnesota is currently leading an effort to have a state fossil declared based on public voting. You can check out the candidates and vote here. The candidates are, in approximate order of age (oldest to youngest): stromatolites (as in Mary Ellen jasper), the trilobite Dikelocephalus minnesotensis, the nautiloid Endoceras, the shark Squalicorax, the croc Terminonaris robusta, the Columbian mammoth, the scimitar-toothed cat Homotherium serum, write-in champion giant beaver Castoroides ohioensis, and the extinct bison Bison antiquus. Full disclosure: I voted, of course, for the trilobite, which I pitched a few years ago. Voting closes September 30, so there's still time to participate.

Sunday, September 5, 2021

Bryozoan Overload

Sometimes you look at a slab, and you notice one special thing about it. "That's a nice Isotelus hypostome." "Neat strophs." "Look at that Phycodes!" In this case, it's "Gee, that's a lot of bryozoans!"

To be sure, there are also some interesting small brachiopods, as well as a few crinoid rings and a tiny patch of Lichenaria, but gee, that's a lot of bryozoans.

(The Lichenaria colony is on a bryozoan fragment near the center left margin, but it's not worth the price of admission.)

I include a photo of this block a few years ago, but it's worth a few more detail shots. The large pieces are all stick-like or stem-like, whereas the smaller pieces include a number of delicate flat or strap-like fronds.

Branching straps plus a few different brachiopods.

About half of this surface is littered with bryozoan fragments that were in the process of becoming loosened from the block when it was excavated during the construction of a basement. Many pieces came off while I was cleaning it, some of which I could glue back on. (Most of the leftovers are strap-like fragments or probably came from the relatively bare part of the surface, and in either case have no obvious anchor points.) Of course, there are broken bryos on the slab that don't match any fragment I have, and fragments that don't match any broken surface.

Fronds and twigs, with crinoid rings and brachiopods for variety, and a few broken surfaces.

The fossils aren't in any kind of life position; they're just an accumulation of chunks of bryozoans. Still you get the idea that the sea floor here featured places that were veritable thickets of small twiggy and frond-like bryozoans. To all you time travelers: probably not recommended for bare feet.

It's bryozoans almost all the way through, as well.

Sunday, August 29, 2021

Further thoughts on the location of Finn's Glen

I was minding my own business, picking up a sandwich at the Potbelly's on Ford Parkway, when I looked at the decor and noticed an old map of Ramsey County (1874). Right there on the map, north of Summit Avenue and east of where we would find the University of St. Thomas today, is "Wm. Finn". William Finn. Finn of Finn's Glen.

Forgive the flare. It was a dramatic moment.

Bingo. Meaning what, exactly? (Unfortunately, it doesn't identify the glen.) Years ago I wrote about Finn's Glen in conjunction with Shadow Falls. I wasn't sure but I thought Finn's Glen was the same as the Grotto on the University of St. Thomas campus, south of Shadow Falls. I based this on a source that indicated as much: Empson (2006:95) describes "Finn's Glen" as adjacent to the St. Paul Seminary, south of Summit Avenue, and a place of meditation. As a University of St. Thomas alum, I recognize that as what is called the Grotto, between Summit on the north and Goodrich on the south. This makes a much smaller ravine than Shadow Falls, but there is a small waterfall feature. Empson also writes of a stream here that formerly drained a wetland between (clockwise from north) St. Clair, Snelling, Randolph, and Fairview. We can see this in Winchell's "Falls of St. Anthony" map (1877). But...

Finn's Glen is clearly marked...

...Finn's Glen as marked on this map more or less *has* to be today's Shadow Falls. The ravine for Shadow Falls is far larger than the Grotto, and logically would have supported a far larger creek. Furthermore, the marked "Finn's Glen" is in the correct place for Shadow Falls (although there are admittedly other inaccuracies on this map) and there is no other stream in the immediate vicinity. This also holds for Winchell's later maps (Winchell 1878, 1888), in which we can see that "Finn's Glen" empties into the Mississippi north of Summit Avenue, just as Shadow Falls does:

From Winchell (1878).

From Winchell (1888).

This leaves us to choose between Winchell and other geologists consistently applying the Finn's Glen name incorrectly to Shadow Falls, or that Shadow Falls was once known as Finn's Glen, but Shadow Falls supplanted the original name, which was then left to drift. Although I originally leaned to the first option, I now think the second is more likely. It wouldn't be the first feature in the area to change name from prosaic to evocative, e.g., Brown's Falls becoming Minnehaha Falls. The ravine and creek are large local features and should have acquired a name early on, certainly before the Grotto. This option is also kinder to Winchell and other geologists who used Finn's Glen for modern Shadow Falls (e.g., Sardeson and Ulrich). Does it fit with the timeline?

Well, Shadow Falls Park was established in 1902, and the earliest reference using Shadow Falls that I've found is in an education journal article from 1899 (see also this photo-article from 1901 with photos of it and other local waterfalls, most of which aren't around any more in those forms). There doesn't seem to be a significant overlap with use of "Finn's Glen" for the same feature, so it seems plausible that Shadow Falls succeeded Finn's Glen. Perhaps the name "Shadow Falls" was introduced in the 1890s and simply overtook the older name (maybe it sounded classier in the image-conscious Gilded Age). Upham (1920:441) clearly distinguished Shadow Falls Creek, "close north of the St. Paul Seminary," from Finn's Glen "about a mile farther south". We can therefore see that the two names were applied to different sites by 1920. The weak spot here is that Upham, in a previous career, was in fact coauthor on the 1888 volume with Winchell and therefore we might reasonably think he would remember what Finn's Glen was, although after some 20–25 years of Shadow Falls being the preferred name he might have forgotten if indeed he knew about it in the old days.

Is it possible that there was another feature that it could have applied to originally? Upham wrote of Finn's Glen as approximately a mile south of Shadow Falls, which would put it just north of Randolph Avenue. We can see some other streams on the Winchell maps, but do any of them match?

Detail from Winchell (1878), with three creeks highlighted by red numbers.

#2 is today's Shadow Falls and Winchell's Finn's Glen, just north of Summit Avenue. #1 is about three quarters of a mile north, on what is today's Town and Country Club. (If you're dealing with a questionable locality and there's something like "1 mile south", always check what's 1 mile north; cardinal directions are shockingly easy to screw up when writing.) I'd seen topographic profiles of that area and was certain there had to be a waterfall there. Well, there was, but it's been gone a long time. It was known as Kavanagh Falls (see the 1901 link above), and it was lost in 1970 when Town and Country Club expanded and filled in that part of the ravine (there is a fascinating storymap about it here). (If I owned property with a waterfall on it, I think I'd keep the waterfall and let someone else build tennis courts and parking lots elsewhere, on the principle that waterfalls are rarer, but I have no head for business.)

#3 is more of a mystery. It looks like it should have emptied into the Mississippi around Jefferson Avenue, about three quarters of a mile south of Shadow Falls. This is not a mile, but it's not unconscionably off, either. This one is even harder to account for than Kavanagh Falls. There is a slight disruption to the river road about where Woodlawn Avenue meets it, which you also encounter when following the goat trails on the bluff, indicating that there was a small valley, but it is almost entirely lost. Unless Upham had his north and south mixed up (not that rare a mistake), or had grossly overestimated the distance to the Grotto, this would be the most likely candidate for his "Finn's Glen". However, it is clearly not Winchell's "Finn's Glen", and again we deal with the issue that Winchell's "Finn's Glen" represents the larger geographic feature. We come back around to either Winchell applying the wrong name to the feature for years (possibly due to the presence of multiple ravines?), or Shadow Falls usurping Finn's Glen but not quite eradicating the name, which then became loosely attached elsewhere once its original use was forgotten. (Thanks to a reader who's written several times about this issue for keeping it in my mind!)

References

Empson, D. L. 2006. The street where you live: a guide to the place names of St. Paul. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Upham, W. 1920. Minnesota geographic names: their origin and historic significance. Collections of the Minnesota Historical Society 17. Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul, Minnesota.

Winchell, N. H. 1877. The geology of Hennepin County. Minnesota Geological Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota. Annual Report 5:131–201.

Winchell, N. H. 1878. The geology of Ramsey County. Minnesota Geological Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota. Annual Report 6:66–92.

Winchell, N. H. 1888. The geology of Ramsey County. Pages 345–374 in N. H. Winchell and W. Upham. The geology of Minnesota. Minnesota Geological and Natural History Survey, Final Report 2. Johnson, Smith & Harrison, state printers, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Sunday, August 15, 2021

Your Friends The Titanosaurs: Hamititan xinjiangensis

As far as I'm concerned, 2021 has been relatively quiet for new dinosaurs (great year for ophthalmosaurid ichthyosaurs, though; I might even learn to spell "ophthalmosaurid" correctly the first time through). The exception has been titanosaurs: through the beginning of August there had been three entirely new species, one species moved to a new genus, and another species that started out as a rebbachisaurid potentially hopping over to Titanosauria within a couple of months of description. Hamititan xinjiangensis makes another new addition. It was published this week (Wang et al. 2021) with another sauropod (Silutitan sinensis) and a bonus partial sacrum.

Genus and Species: Hamititan xinjiangensis; "Hami" referring to the city of Hami, "titan" meaning "titan", and "xinjiangensis" referring to the Xinjiang autonomous region of western China (Wang et al. 2021). Together they mean something akin to "Hami titan from Xinjiang".

Citation: Wang, X., K. L. N. Bandeira, R. Qiu, S. Jiang, X. Cheng, Y. Ma, and A. W. A. Kellner. 2021. The first dinosaurs from the Early Cretaceous Hami Pterosaur Fauna, China. Scientific Reports 11:14962. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94273-7.

Stratigraphy and Geography: H. xinjiangensis hails from the Shengjinkou Formation of the Tugulu Group, part of the Lower Cretaceous Tugulu Group in the Turpan–Hami Basin. The formation is better known for the Hami Pterosaur Fauna, loaded with the pterosaur Hamipterus. The holotype and only known specimen of H. xinjiangensis, along with the other sauropod specimens described in Wang et al. (2021), came from lacustrine sandstone. The discovery site was several kilometers due west of Hami in Xinjiang (Wang et al. 2021).

Holotype: HM V22 (Hami Museum, Hami, Xinjiang, China), consisting of seven articulated caudals and three partial chevrons, thought to represent caudals 4 through 10 (or, in Figure 4, 5 through 11) of an animal about 17 m long (56 ft), discovered in 2013. A small theropod shed tooth was found nearby (Wang et al. 2021).

Figure 4 in Wang et al. (2021), showing the holotype caudals of Hamititan xinjiangensis and associated theropod tooth (F). Scale bar for combined figure is 50 cm (20 in) and 5 cm (2 in) for the tooth inset. See here for full caption. CC BY 4.0.

Is H. xinjiangensis indeed a titanosaur? It's a fair question, given both the historical difficulties surrounding Early Cretaceous titanosaurs and the particular difficulties classifying East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropods, which seem to be doing their own thing. First things first: H. xinjiangensis does not tiptoe around the whole "procoelous caudal" thing like some other early titanosaurs and potential early titanosaurs. It is boldly, proudly procoelous. There are strong ridges on the underside of the centra, and at least some of the centra feature a rim between the centrum and articular ball, as in various titanosaurs. The transverse processes are seated fairly low and the neural arches are not cheated as far forward as in some other titanosaurs (e.g., aeolosaurs). The bones do not feature spongy texture (Wang et al. 2021). Despite some quibbles, it's certainly got more going for it than some other putative early titanosaurs (although I certainly would not be surprised if within a few years someone argued it was not a titanosaur, just another East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropod with a titanosaur-like tail).

Is it Silutitan? Well, we can be reasonably certain that the holotype of H. xinjiangensis is not from the same individual as the holotype of S. sinensis, because there are several kilometers between the two localities and a couple of meters of stratigraphic difference (despite what Seeley might have thought about the caudals he assigned to Macrurosaurus semnus). To look at this phylogenetically, Wang et al. (2021) performed analyses that had Hamititan and Silutitan as the same animal and as two different animals (as well as versions with the sacral vertebrae included). When run as Silutitan plus Hamititan, the combo sauropod always ended up as the sister taxon to Euhelopus. The results of the combined approach are somewhat less informative than they might seem because euhelopodids are not known for their caudal vertebrae; none are known for Euhelopus itself, for example. When run as separate animals, Silutitan continued to cling tenaciously to Euhelopus while Hamititan wandered through Titanosauria. Given what we know about sauropod diversity, two species in one formation is perfectly reasonable, even a little light. (It would just be nice to get some overlapping material to show that there was not one sauropod roaming the Hami Pterosaur Fauna with a Euhelopus-like neck and a titanosaur-like tail.)

References

Wang, X., K. L. N. Bandeira, R. Qiu, S. Jiang, X. Cheng, Y. Ma, and A. W. A. Kellner. 2021. The first dinosaurs from the Early Cretaceous Hami Pterosaur Fauna, China. Scientific Reports 11:14962. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94273-7.

Sunday, August 8, 2021

Geranosaurus atavus

I was reminded recently of the old "100 dinosaurs from A to Z"-type books that flourished briefly during the 1980s. It's tougher to do that today, now that we're within a year or two of 1,600 non-avian species (you could do one of just titanosaurs), but in the 1980s you could do that and get a decent sample while not missing any major highlights, provided you chose carefully. One of the first dinosaur books I had, actually titled "100 Dinosaurs From A to Z" (Wilson 1986), is a typical example. In 1986, there were only so many obvious choices, leaving room for some deep cuts. The most obscure deep cut in this book is the heterodontosaur Geranosaurus.

Sunday, August 1, 2021

Practical applications of Chesapecten, early 19th century

"Fossil pectens of a large size, some of them ten inches wide, are found abundantly in the lower part of Virginia. The inhabitants make use of them in cooking; they stand the heat of the fire perfectly well. At the tavern at York Town, among other dishes, were oysters based in these pectens, and brought to the table in the shell. I wanted the company of a few scientific friends to enjoy the treat. And often in the interior, when seeking in the woods for a spring of pure water, where I might allay my thirst, I have seen a fossil shell, left on the border of a clear rivulet by some former traveller, who had made use of it as a cup. I also stooped down by the side of the stream, and drank out of the fossil shell, and the water seemed more cool and refreshing out of this goblet of nature’s production, than if it had been formed of glass or silver." (Finch 1833)

Chesapecten madisonius, not quite as famous as C. jeffersonius but still quite nice.

References

Finch, J. 1833. Travels in the United States of America and Canada. Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longman, London, United Kingdom.